Skip to content
SALUS · For Heavy Civil, Earthworks & Excavation Contractors

Remote corridors, live excavations, no signal — and the documentation still has to hold.

Your excavation and ground-disturbance program is solid. The question is execution where the work actually is: a corridor with no signal, a trench that opened this morning, locates confirmed verbally instead of logged. SALUS is the operational safety platform built for that gap — and it works fully offline, because the corridor doesn't have bars. Crews capture at the source with one QR scan, in their language, in the field — and Rosie turns every captured fact into the assessments, programs, and COR record the whole company runs on, from the trench to the bid room.

Trusted by Wildstone Construction and heavy civil contractors across Canada — from BC to the Yukon.

Excavation inspection — Mile marker 47 · Subpart P6:40 AM
Competent person
R. Mendez — at the trench, GPS-confirmed
Soil class
Type B — sloping verified, photo attached
Protective system
Trench box · depth 7'2" · ladder within 25'
Utility locates
Marks photo-verified · ticket #4471 active
2:10 PM
Rainfall event — re-inspection triggered, completed 2:45
On the dashboard in real time — not next Monday.GPS + photo verified
400–800K utility strikes/yr · $56K each
This inspection ends up in a DOT bid
  1. From the trench to the bid · one QR scan

  2. The trench

  3. The office

  4. The bid room

  5. One fact, traveling

The problem

Three problems. Only one is about paperwork.

Compliant and effective are different things. The forms existing is compliance. The procedure being at the trench — offline, where there's no signal — that's effectiveness, and it's where heavy civil safety programs actually break.

01

Your permits exist. They get filled when the crew gets back in range.

The excavation permit and the ground-disturbance checklist get filled on paper, or from memory once there's signal, while the trench is already open. A 40-question generic checklist doesn't produce the same protection as task-specific questions — the locates, the soil classification, the protective system — that force a real conversation about this excavation, today.

02

Hours a day on documentation nobody can submit from the corridor.

Excavation permits, equipment inspections, traffic-control plans, daily reports — and a remote site with no connectivity. At $65–$90/hr fully loaded, that's $230–$315 per foreman, per day, much of it spent driving back into range to submit paper that should have synced itself.

03

You measure what happened. Not what's about to.

Your incident log tells you who got hurt last year. It doesn't tell you that one corridor's excavation-permit completion dropped from 95% to 62% since the crew changed. Leading indicators predict incidents — but only if the data made it back from the field.

The fix isn't more program. It's the procedure, at the trench — offline, where the work is.

The heavy civil constants

Two things never change out here: no bars, and weather.

Every platform demos well in the office. Heavy civil happens on remote cuts with zero signal, under a sky that rewrites the day's compliance obligations at 2 PM. SALUS was architected for exactly these two facts — not adapted to them.

Constant 01 · Zero bars

Offline isn't a feature. It's the architecture.

A large share of heavy-equipment inspections happen where phones show nothing — and adoption there is identical to always-connected sites, because the tool doesn't care. Every keystroke saves locally at the cut, queues with a waypoint, and syncs within minutes of bars returning. The dead-zone log proves it: the record from mile marker 47 is as complete as the one from the yard.

A reports panel with a dead-zone log showing four records captured offline — a waypoint location, an inspection, and forms queued for sync
Constant 02 · Weather

The sky changes the rules. The system keeps up.

Rain triggers Subpart P re-inspection obligations at every affected excavation — and SALUS fires the alert, tracks completion, and flags the misses, county by county, automatically. Wind crossing thresholds raises site-condition alerts; stand-downs push to every phone with acknowledgment tracked by name. Rosie watches conditions across the whole map so nobody has to watch the radar and the spreadsheet at once.

Rosie's site conditions view monitoring four active sites — a 38 mph wind speed alert at Downtown Tower, with one-tap notification options

Captured at the cut. Synced at the bars. Re-inspected after the rain.

01The trench

It starts with one scan before the crew breaks ground.

6:12 AM, a corridor with no signal. A foreman QRs the excavation before the dig. Everything below happens because of it — offline.

Crew-level capture · at the trench, offline

The gap between "the locates looked fine" and "it's logged" is where crews get buried.

Your crews have opened the trench a thousand times — and that familiarity is the danger. SALUS puts everything at the point of work, faster than winging it, and it all works with no signal: the same safety your program already specifies, with the friction gone. In a live excavation, that's what prevention actually means.

01

The excavation permit at the trench — locates, soil class, protective system

Scan the QR at the excavation: the permit loads with the locate confirmation, the soil classification, the protective-system selection, and the daily inspection — in the field, fully offline. The permit opens when the locates are confirmed and the protective system is set, not before. The reading gets logged at the trench, not reconstructed from memory back in range.

Daily excavation inspection — MM 47 · Subpart PLive
6:40 AM
Checklist opened at the trench — GPS confirms location
6:43 AM
Soil Type B — conditional logic loads sloping + box requirements
6:48 AM
Photos: protective system, access ladder, spoil pile setback
2:10 PM
Rainfall event — re-inspection alert fired automatically
2:45 PM
Re-inspection complete — tracked, on the record
Inspector at the trench — the data proves it.Verified
02

Everything works with no signal

This is the one that matters in a corridor: capture doesn't wait for bars. The permit, the inspection, the hazard report, the photo — all of it happens offline at the trench and syncs the moment the truck climbs back into range. The remote site stops being a documentation black hole.

03

Equipment inspection tied to the operator

QR pre-use inspections on the excavator, the loader, the compactor — tied to operator credentials. A deficiency identified in the field routes to the maintenance team with a photo, and a critical failure flags the assignment before the machine moves dirt.

An excavator pre-use inspection tied to the operator — a deficiency routes to maintenance with a photo, before the machine moves dirt
04

The assessment takes a photo and a sentence — in any language

The foreman talks or films the trench, and Rosie structures the assessment and the permit record — worker, task, and location attached. Many civil crews work in more than one language and handwritten forms come back illegible; voice-to-text gives the office the most accurate field data it has ever had.

A foreman speaks to Rosie at the edge of the excavation — the voice note becomes a structured assessment, legible and photo-backed, in any language
05

Field answers, offline, at the trench

The crew asks Rosie about the soil class, the setback, the traffic-control setup, or the SWP — and the answer comes back offline, in their language, at the point of work. No signal, no waiting, no guessing.

Wildstone Construction runs two annual COR audits — BC and the Yukon — from one platform, and eliminated the full-time role that used to process paper across remote sites.

The procedure at the trench, not the permit filled back in range — and provable to any auditor in seconds.

02The office

The same scan is now your safety director's eyes — across every province.

Every permit, inspection, and locate from every corridor — one living record, watched continuously, even the sites with no signal.

Leading indicators · always-current compliance

Stop compiling. Start preventing.

A heavy civil safety director's nightmare isn't the hazard the crew sees — it's the gap nobody sees: the excavation permit that never synced from a remote corridor, the equipment cert that lapsed mid-project, the crew whose inspection quality has been sliding for three weeks two provinces away. Because every crew captures at the source and it all syncs when they're back in range, the record is rich enough to watch itself — and Rosie watches it continuously. Leading indicators can predict the large majority of incidents before they happen. This is that data, building itself. 🍁 Across the rest of Canada, that record is the COR audit package and the provincial OHS evidence — with the locate confirmations from the provincial one-call held alongside — assembled on demand, even across two provinces at once. ⚜️ In Québec, it's the CNESST file and the comité de santé et de sécurité record under Bill 59, in French, with the Info-Excavation locate confirmations tracked the same way.

Two provinces, one dashboard

COR compliance across BC and the Yukon — or any two jurisdictions — managed from one platform, each audit's slightly different requirements assembled on demand instead of from two filing systems.

Corrective actions that close at a distance

Assigned to a named person — not 'the safety department' — tracked when viewed, closed with a photo, even when the site is a thousand kilometres away. Average close time drops from 14 days to 3.5.

Updates at network speed

Revise an excavation SWP or a traffic-control plan once and it's live on every site and every QR code the moment each crew next syncs. No driving pages out to the corridor.

Drift flagged this week

Excavation-permit completion dropping from 95% to 62% on one corridor after a crew change shows up on your screen in 30 seconds — not in next quarter's incident review.

Ask Rosie — answered from your own field record
  • "Which corridors have excavation permits that haven't synced in 48 hours?"
  • "Show near-miss trends for utility strikes and cave-ins across all sites this quarter."
  • "Write a toolbox talk for a deep excavation with the soil-classification and protective-system steps."
Every excavation inspection from every corridor in one view — including the remote sites that synced overnightThe equipment fleet across every site — pre-use inspections tied to operators, deficiencies routed before the machines move
The fleet · inspections, status, lifecycle

Dozens of machines across 200 sites. One source of truth.

In heavy civil, the fleet is the program: the excavator that ran three days on a documented deficiency, the crane whose operator nobody re-verified, the dozer that went to failure because the work order lived on a clipboard. SALUS makes the machine itself the record — scan it for everything, and everything about it flows to one fleet view the shop and the safety office share.

The 6-minute walk-around

QR on the machine loads the inspection with equipment ID, operator, and GPS — 6.2 minutes instead of 18.8, with 94% fewer errors and a 96% audit pass rate versus 73% on paper.

Deficiency to shop, at the scan

Photos, severity, and parts needed route to maintenance the moment they're captured — and the out-of-service flag is visible to every operator who scans, on every site, instantly.

Maintenance before failure

The preventative view across the whole fleet: what's due this week, what's overdue, what's trending toward trouble — so machines get serviced on schedule, not after the blowout.

Status the schedule can trust

In maintenance, back-in-production dates, utilization — live by machine. The PM plans around real availability instead of radio calls to the shop.

Every scan also re-verifies the pairing that OSHA's crane standard demands: this operator, this machine, this shift — NCCCO and operator quals checked at the form, renewals pushed 30 days ahead.
Preventative maintenance dashboard showing 1,248 assets, 24 due this week, and overdue itemsRecent asset reports with statuses moving from In Maintenance to Available, with back-in-production dates

Scan it for everything. The repair loop starts at the scan. The schedule plans on real status.

03The bid room

By Friday, that scan is winning the next corridor.

Crew-level facts become the live proof owners and GCs now demand — assembled from sites with no signal.

Prequalification & winning work

The work you want goes to the contractor who can prove it — and the owner checks your evidence first.

Canadian owners and general contractors increasingly require COR certification and documented safety performance before you can bid — and they don't ask whether you have an excavation program, they ask for the records: COR status, documented systems, daily compliance evidence across every site. Every fact your crews captured at the trench — even offline, even two provinces away — is already that evidence. The Trust Portal shares it as a live link, verifiable by any GC or owner in minutes, no SALUS account required. And there's an insurance dividend: documented control is what earns the rebate and the insurer's incentive.

  • Prequal answered with a live link instead of a binder assembled from two provinces' filing systems the night before the deadline.
  • Your experience rating protected at the execution level — every claim feeds the WCB or WSIB premium you pay, and a cave-in or utility strike is where the worst claims come from.
  • When the records request or the insurer's review comes, Rosie assembles the packet from the same field record — in minutes, across every corridor.
Wildstone Construction is COR certified in BC and the Yukon — two external audits a year, each with different provincial requirements — and now manages both from one platform, with the remote-site paper role eliminated entirely.
The Trust Portal — live safety performance shared with a click: the GC or owner sees active certs, inspections, and COR status across every provinceRosie assembles the prequalification and insurance-readiness package — COR status, closed corrective actions, and inspection history — across every corridor

The evidence that wins the bid is already captured at the trench.

The circuit · trench → office → bid room

One scan before the dig. Proof everywhere it matters — even with no signal.

Capture once, at the source, with no friction and no signal — and let Rosie carry the fact to everyone who needs it, in whatever form they need it.

FAQ

Asked by heavy civil and earthworks contractors, answered straight.

We work in corridors with no signal. Does SALUS actually work offline?
Yes — that's the point. The excavation permit, the equipment inspection, the hazard report, the photo, and Rosie's answers all work fully offline at the trench, and sync the moment the crew climbs back into range. The remote corridor stops being a documentation black hole — and your foremen recover $36K–$74K a year of documentation time each.
How does SALUS handle COR across two provinces, locates, and Québec's CNESST regime?
🍁 Across the rest of Canada, SALUS assembles the COR audit package and the provincial OHS evidence from the same field capture — with the locate confirmations from the provincial one-call held alongside — and it does it across two provinces at once, each audit's requirements assembled on demand. Wildstone runs BC and Yukon COR audits from one platform on exactly this basis. ⚜️ In Québec, the same record feeds CNESST and the comité de santé et de sécurité under Bill 59, in French, with Info-Excavation locate confirmations tracked the same way, and supports a mutuelle de prévention file where documented prevention helps lower the premium (15 to 50% depending on the group).
What's the difference between 'compliant' and 'effective'?
Compliant: the permits exist. Effective: the permit loads at the trench with the locates confirmed and the soil class set, near-misses get reported from the field, corrective actions close in 3.5 days instead of 14 even at a distance, and you can show any auditor or insurer the live record. That's the difference between a binder and a defence.
How does excavation-permit gating work without stopping the crew?
SALUS gates the sign-off, not the worker. The excavation permit won't open until the locates are confirmed, the soil classification is set, and the protective system is selected — so the gap is caught before the dig, not after. Expirations on equipment and operator certs also surface weeks ahead with the refresher pushed to the worker's phone.
How does SALUS handle multilingual crews and illegible field reports?
On multilingual civil crews, comprehension is a safety system, not a luxury — and handwritten forms come back illegible. Workers ask Rosie and capture by voice in their own language; the office reads everything in English, legible and structured. PECI calls it the most accurate field data the company has ever had.
How painful is it to move off paper or our current system?
Hours, not months. Wildstone eliminated a full-time paper-processing role. Upload your permit and inspection library and Rosie converts it — conditional logic added, institutional knowledge intact. The crews who push back hardest tend to become the biggest champions once the printer trips are gone.
I'm an exec. Why should I care about safety software?
Three reasons. Your foremen lose hours a day to paper compliance and driving back into range to submit it — $36K–$74K per foreman per year. Your best superintendent's excavation judgment can't be on 50 corridors at once unless it's encoded into the system. And documented control is money: it earns the rebate, defends your experience rating, and increasingly decides which work you're allowed to bid.
For heavy civil, earthworks & excavation contractors

Remote corridors, live excavations, no signal. SALUS makes the documentation hold.

Bring your excavation permit process, your equipment inspection forms, and your last prequal package — and watch one QR scan replace all three in a 15-minute demo, offline included.

Trusted by Wildstone Construction and heavy civil contractors across Canada — from BC to the Yukon.