Skip to content
All safety questions
Asked by a personGeneral — US and Canadaen-CA

Write a risk assessment for Biology Experiment

A person submitted this question to Rosie's free generator. The asker's identity is neither imported nor published.

Rosie's answer

Published by SALUS

Laboratory Safety Risk Assessment for Biology Experiment ========================================================

Assessment Date: \[DATE]

Assessor: \[ASSESSOR NAME]

Department/Area: \[DEPARTMENT/AREA]

Review Date: \[REVIEW DATE]

1\. Assessment Scope


This risk assessment covers routine preparation, handling, transfer, incubation, observation, and disposal activities associated with a biology experiment in a laboratory setting. It includes the use of biological materials, culture media, reagents, disinfectants, and associated laboratory chemicals; the operation of common laboratory equipment; exposure controls; PPE selection; spill response; waste segregation and disposal; and compliance with laboratory safety procedures, COSHH-style chemical control principles, and biosafety requirements. The assessment applies to laboratory workers, supervisors, students, visitors, and any support personnel who may enter the work area during the experiment. It excludes unrelated maintenance work, major equipment repair, and any procedures involving higher-containment biological agents unless separately authorized and assessed.

2\. Risk Assessment Methodology


A task-based risk assessment approach was used, combining hazard identification, likelihood and severity evaluation, and selection of controls using the hierarchy of controls. The assessment considers chemical, biological, physical, and procedural hazards, including special conditions that may increase risk. Controls are selected in order of preference: elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative controls, work practices, and PPE. The assessment also follows a structured review of what the hazards are, what the worst credible outcome could be, how the hazard can be prevented, how people can be protected, and what actions are required if something goes wrong. This approach is consistent with laboratory risk assessment principles that require identification of chemicals, quantities, circumstances of use, and evaluation of toxic, physical, reactive, flammable, explosive, radiation, and biological hazards before work begins.

3\. Risk Matrix Reference


The following matrix is used to evaluate risk levels based on likelihood and severity:

Likelihood

| Rare | Unlikely | Possible | Likely | Almost Certain | | Severity | Catastrophic | Low | Low | Low | Low | Medium | | Major | Low | Low | Low | Medium | Medium | | Moderate | Low | Low | Medium | High | High | | Minor | Low | Medium | High | High | Extreme | | Negligible | Medium | High | High | Extreme | Extreme |

4\. Hazard Identification and Risk Evaluation


1\. Exposure to biological materials such as cultures, specimens, or contaminated surfaces during inoculation, transfer, sampling, or observation.

Potential Consequences: Infection, allergic sensitization, contamination of work surfaces, cross-contamination of samples, and secondary exposure to other workers through poor hygiene or inadequate decontamination. [1]

Affected Persons: Laboratory workers, students, supervisors, cleaners, and anyone handling contaminated equipment or waste.

Initial Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
PossibleMajorHigh
Control Measures
  • Eliminate unnecessary handling steps and use pre-prepared materials where feasible.
  • Substitute lower-risk teaching strains or non-pathogenic materials where the experiment allows.
  • Use engineering controls such as a certified biological safety cabinet when aerosol generation is possible.
  • Apply administrative controls including restricted access, written SOPs, clear labeling, and defined decontamination procedures.
  • Use work practices that minimize splashing, aerosol generation, and surface contamination; disinfect benches before and after work.
  • Wear appropriate PPE including laboratory coat, disposable gloves, and eye protection; upgrade to face protection if splash risk exists.
Residual Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
UnlikelyMajorMedium

2\. Chemical exposure from reagents, stains, fixatives, disinfectants, buffers, or preservatives used in the biology experiment.

Potential Consequences: Skin and eye irritation, chemical burns, respiratory irritation, sensitization, poisoning, or adverse effects from inhalation, ingestion, or skin absorption. [1] [1]

Affected Persons: Laboratory workers, students, and anyone nearby during preparation, dispensing, or cleanup.

Initial Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
PossibleMajorHigh
Control Measures
  • Substitute less hazardous reagents or lower-concentration solutions where scientifically acceptable.
  • Use engineering controls such as local exhaust ventilation or a fume hood for volatile or irritating chemicals.
  • Store chemicals in compatible containers with secondary containment and clear labeling.
  • Consult SDS information before use and ensure quantities are limited to the minimum required for the task.
  • Use administrative controls including chemical inventory control, training, and spill response procedures.
  • Wear chemical-resistant gloves, safety glasses or splash goggles, laboratory coat, and additional face protection where splash risk is present.
Residual Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
UnlikelyMajorMedium

3\. Aerosol generation during pipetting, vortexing, centrifugation, mixing, or opening containers containing biological or chemical materials.

Potential Consequences: Inhalation exposure, mucous membrane contamination, spread of infectious or irritating material, and contamination of adjacent work areas.

Affected Persons: Laboratory workers, nearby occupants, and cleaners.

Initial Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
LikelyMajorHigh
Control Measures
  • Eliminate aerosol-generating steps where possible by using closed systems or gentler methods.
  • Use sealed centrifuge rotors or safety cups and open them only after aerosols have settled.
  • Perform aerosol-generating work in a biological safety cabinet or other suitable containment device.
  • Use administrative controls such as task sequencing, restricted access, and clear waiting periods after centrifugation.
  • Train workers in correct pipetting, tube opening, and spill avoidance techniques.
  • Wear eye protection, gloves, and laboratory coat; add respiratory protection only if required by the hazard assessment and local program.
Residual Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
PossibleModerateMedium

4\. Sharps injuries from needles, blades, broken glass, pipette tips, or contaminated sharps used during sample preparation or disposal.

Potential Consequences: Cuts, puncture wounds, infection, exposure to biological agents or chemicals, and contamination of the work area.

Affected Persons: Laboratory workers, waste handlers, and cleaners.

Initial Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
PossibleMajorHigh
Control Measures
  • Eliminate sharps where possible by using needle-free or plastic alternatives.
  • Use puncture-resistant sharps containers located at point of use.
  • Implement safe handling rules for glassware, blades, and sharps; never recap needles unless a validated procedure requires it.
  • Provide training on sharps segregation, disposal, and incident reporting.
  • Inspect glassware before use and remove damaged items from service.
  • Wear suitable gloves and eye protection; use cut-resistant protection only where it does not create entanglement or dexterity issues.
Residual Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
UnlikelyMajorMedium

5\. Spills, splashes, or leaks from liquid cultures, reagents, disinfectants, or waste containers during transport, pouring, or cleanup.

Potential Consequences: Skin and eye exposure, slip hazards, contamination spread, equipment damage, and delayed work due to decontamination.

Affected Persons: Laboratory workers, students, visitors, and cleaners.

Initial Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
LikelyModerateHigh
Control Measures
  • Use closed or capped containers and secondary containment for transport.
  • Substitute smaller working volumes where possible to reduce spill severity.
  • Provide spill kits, absorbents, disinfectants, and clear spill response instructions.
  • Use administrative controls such as designated transfer routes and limits on container fill levels.
  • Train workers to stop work, isolate the area, and report spills immediately.
  • Wear gloves, splash-resistant eye protection, and laboratory coat; use face protection for larger splash potential.
Residual Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
PossibleMinorLow

6\. Exposure to incompatible chemicals, incorrect mixing, or reaction hazards during preparation of media, disinfectants, or experimental reagents.

Potential Consequences: Heat generation, toxic gas release, fire, pressure buildup, container rupture, or chemical burns.

Affected Persons: Laboratory workers and anyone in the immediate vicinity.

Initial Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
UnlikelyCatastrophicExtreme
Control Measures
  • Eliminate incompatible combinations by reviewing the full procedure before work begins.
  • Substitute safer reagents or pre-mixed solutions where feasible.
  • Use engineering controls such as fume hoods and pressure-rated containers where required.
  • Require pre-task review of SDSs, compatibility information, and step-by-step instructions.
  • Limit batch size and prohibit unapproved scale-up without additional review.
  • Wear appropriate chemical PPE and ensure emergency equipment is immediately available.
Residual Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
RareMajorMedium

7\. Use of centrifuges, incubators, hot plates, autoclaves, or other laboratory equipment that can create mechanical, thermal, or pressure hazards.

Potential Consequences: Burns, entrapment, flying fragments, equipment failure, sample release, or injury from moving parts and hot surfaces.

Affected Persons: Laboratory workers, maintenance staff, and nearby persons.

Initial Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
PossibleMajorHigh
Control Measures
  • Use equipment only for its intended purpose and within manufacturer limits.
  • Inspect equipment before use and remove defective items from service.
  • Use guards, lids, interlocks, and temperature controls where provided.
  • Allow hot items and pressurized vessels to cool and depressurize before handling.
  • Provide task-specific training and restrict access to authorized users.
  • Wear suitable PPE including eye protection, lab coat, and heat-resistant gloves when handling hot items.
Residual Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
UnlikelyModerateLow

8\. Poor housekeeping, cluttered benches, blocked exits, or improper storage of materials in the laboratory.

Potential Consequences: Trips, falls, delayed evacuation, accidental contact with hazardous materials, and increased likelihood of spills or dropped items.

Affected Persons: All laboratory occupants and emergency responders.

Initial Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
LikelyMinorMedium
Control Measures
  • Keep benches, floors, and access routes clear at all times.
  • Store materials in designated locations with compatible segregation.
  • Remove waste and unused materials promptly.
  • Use administrative controls such as end-of-task housekeeping checks and supervisor inspections.
  • Maintain clear access to eyewash stations, safety showers, fire extinguishers, and exits.
  • Wear closed-toe footwear and maintain good laboratory housekeeping practices.
Residual Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
UnlikelyMinorLow

9\. Human error, inadequate training, or failure to follow SOPs during preparation, handling, or disposal activities.

Potential Consequences: Incorrect procedures, exposure incidents, sample loss, contamination, equipment damage, and delayed emergency response.

Affected Persons: Laboratory workers, students, supervisors, and others relying on the work area being safe.

Initial Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
PossibleMajorHigh
Control Measures
  • Provide task-specific training before independent work is permitted.
  • Use written SOPs, checklists, and supervision for higher-risk steps.
  • Require pre-task briefings for unusual procedures, new materials, or changes in method.
  • Implement competency checks and refresher training after incidents or procedural changes.
  • Encourage stop-work authority when conditions are unclear or unsafe.
  • Use PPE as the last line of defense, not as the primary control.
Residual Risk Assessment
LikelihoodSeverityRisk Rating
UnlikelyModerateLow

5\. General Control Measures


  • Maintain a current laboratory chemical and biological inventory with SDS access and hazard information available before work begins.

Review the identity, quantity, and use conditions of all materials in advance so that hazards are understood before handling begins. [1] [3]

  • Apply the hierarchy of controls before relying on PPE.

Prioritize elimination, substitution, engineering controls, administrative controls, and work practices before selecting PPE as a supplementary measure. [1] [4]

  • Ensure emergency equipment, spill response materials, and emergency contact information are known and accessible.

Post emergency numbers prominently, and ensure workers know the location of eyewash stations, safety showers, fire alarms, telephones, and spill kits before starting work. [1]

  • Restrict access to the laboratory and control work activities to trained and authorized persons only.

Limit entry during active handling of biological or chemical materials and use supervision for students or inexperienced workers. [2]

  • Maintain good housekeeping and decontamination standards throughout the experiment.

Clean and disinfect work surfaces before and after use, segregate waste correctly, and remove clutter that could interfere with safe movement or emergency response. [6]

6\. Emergency Preparedness


  • Biological spill response: stop work, warn others, restrict access, allow aerosols to settle if applicable, then disinfect and clean the area using the approved laboratory procedure. Dispose of cleanup materials as contaminated waste. [1]
  • Chemical spill response: isolate the area, identify the substance if safe to do so, consult the SDS, use the spill kit only if trained and the spill is within the laboratory's capability, and escalate to emergency response if the spill is large, volatile, toxic, or reactive. [1]

[1]

  • Exposure response: if skin or eye contact occurs, immediately flush the affected area with water using the nearest eyewash or safety shower and seek medical evaluation according to local procedure. [1]
  • Fire response: activate the alarm, evacuate if the fire cannot be safely controlled, and use only trained personnel and appropriate extinguishers for incipient-stage fires. [1]
  • Sharps injury response: encourage bleeding only if required by local protocol, wash the area, report immediately, and arrange medical assessment and incident investigation. [6]

7\. Training Requirements


  • Laboratory Biosafety and Chemical Hygiene Training: All personnel must receive task-specific training before handling biological materials or hazardous chemicals. Training should cover hazard recognition, safe handling, contamination prevention, SDS use, decontamination, and emergency actions. Workers must understand that unknown substances and mixtures should be treated conservatively and that exposure must be minimized. [1]

[1]

  • Review of experiment-specific hazards
  • SDS and label interpretation
  • Safe transfer and containment techniques
  • Decontamination and waste segregation
  • Incident reporting and stop-work authority
  • PPE Selection and Use Training: Workers must be trained to select, don, doff, inspect, and maintain PPE correctly. Training should emphasize that PPE is the last line of defense and must be matched to the hazard, including eye protection, gloves, laboratory coats, and any task-specific respiratory or face protection. [1]

[5]

  • Correct glove selection for chemical compatibility
  • When to use safety glasses versus splash goggles
  • Limitations of PPE and the need for other controls
  • Inspection, replacement, and disposal of contaminated PPE
  • Biological Spill and Decontamination Training: Personnel must be trained in spill response, surface disinfection, contaminated waste handling, and post-exposure reporting. Training should include how to isolate the area, prevent spread, and use approved disinfectants and cleanup methods. [1]
  • Spill kit contents and use
  • Surface disinfection sequence
  • Contaminated waste disposal
  • Escalation criteria for large or unusual spills
  • Equipment Safety and Safe Work Practices Training: Workers must be trained on the safe operation of centrifuges, incubators, hot plates, autoclaves, and any other equipment used in the experiment. Training should cover pre-use inspection, correct loading, temperature and pressure hazards, and shutdown procedures. [1]
  • Pre-use checks and defect reporting
  • Safe handling of hot or pressurized items
  • Guarding and interlocks
  • Authorized-user restrictions

8\. Monitoring and Review


Review Frequency: Annually and after any incident, near miss, procedural change, new material introduction, or equipment change.

Monitoring TypeFrequencyResponsible PartyDescription
Regular InspectionBefore each use and at the end of each practical sessionLaboratory worker and supervising instructor or supervisorInspect work area, equipment, PPE, spill kits, eyewash access, waste containers, and housekeeping conditions. Confirm that materials are correctly labeled, containers are intact, and no unsafe accumulation of waste or clutter is present. [6]
Exposure Control CheckDuring each task involving aerosols, volatile chemicals, or splash riskSupervisor or competent laboratory leadVerify that engineering controls are in use, work practices are followed, and PPE is appropriate for the task. Confirm that workers are not exposed beyond acceptable limits and that containment remains effective. [1]
Waste and Decontamination AuditWeekly during active experimental periodsLaboratory manager or designated safety representativeCheck that biological and chemical waste is segregated correctly, containers are closed and labeled, and decontamination records are complete. Verify that contaminated materials are removed promptly and stored in approved locations. [6]
Risk Assessment ReviewAfter any incident, near miss, change in procedure, new material, or equipment changePrincipal investigator, supervisor, or laboratory safety leadReview the assessment whenever the experiment changes or when an incident indicates that controls may not be effective. Update hazards, controls, and training requirements accordingly. [2]

9\. Special Circumstances


  • Night work or reduced staffing increases the consequence of delayed spill response, reduced supervision, and slower emergency escalation. Additional communication checks and supervision are required. [1]
  • Lone work increases the severity of any exposure, injury, or spill event because immediate assistance may not be available. Lone work should be avoided for higher-risk steps and permitted only with prior authorization and communication checks. [1]
  • Hot weather, poor ventilation, or crowded workspaces can increase heat stress, reduce comfort, and make PPE less tolerable, which may lead to unsafe behavior or reduced compliance. [2]
  • Any scale-up of biological or chemical preparation requires additional prior review because larger quantities can increase spill severity, exposure potential, and emergency complexity. [1]

Approval and Sign-off


This risk assessment has been reviewed and approved by:

Assessor: _________________________ Date: __________

Manager/Supervisor: _________________________ Date: __________

Safety Representative: _________________________ Date: __________

This risk assessment must be reviewed annually and after any incident, near miss, procedural change, new material introduction, or equipment change. or when significant changes occur.

Safety powered by SALUS

6 source record(s)

Sources used for this answer

[1] Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Guide

Page 35

Open source document

Source excerpt

# SAMPLE PPE POLICIES # Introduction The purpose of the Personal Protective Equipment Policies is to protect the employees of (Name of your business) from exposure to work place hazards and the risk of injury through the use of personal protective equipment (PPE). PPE is not a substitute for more effective control methods and its use will be considered only when other means of protection against hazards are not adequate or feasible. It will be used in conjunction with other controls unless no other means of hazard control exist. Personal protective equipment will be provided, used, and maintained when it has been determined that its use is required to ensure the safety and health of our employees and that such use will lessen the likelihood of occupational injury and/or illness. This section addresses general PPE requirements, including eye and face, head, foot and leg, hand and arm, body (torso) protection, and protection from drowning. Separate programs exist for respiratory protection and hearing protection as the need for participation in these programs is established through industrial hygiene monitoring. (List other programs or policies requiring PPE, such as Hearing Protection, Respiratory Protection, Fall Protection, etc., that you may have at your work place) are also addressed in (State the section or location in your Accident Prevention Program where they are found) The (Name of your business) Personal Protective Equipment Policies includes: - Responsibilities of supervisors and employees • Hazard assessment and PPE selection - Employee training - Cleaning and Maintenance of PPE Sample Policies-2

[2] General Industry Safety and Health Standards (MIOSHA)

Page 9

Open source document

Source excerpt

# 1910.1450 APPENDIX A NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS CONCERNING CHEMICAL HYGIENE IN LABORATORIES (NON-MANDATORY) (cont.) ## A. General Principles (cont.) Every laboratory should develop facility-specific policies and procedures for the highest-risk materials and procedures used in their laboratory. To identify these, consideration should be given to past accidents, process conditions, chemicals used in large volumes, and particularly hazardous chemicals. Perform Risk Assessments for Hazardous Chemicals and Procedures Prior to Laboratory Work: (a) Identify chemicals to be used, amounts required, and circumstances of use in the experiment. Consider any special employee or laboratory conditions that could create or increase a hazard. Consult sources of safety and health information and experienced scientists to ensure that those conducting the risk assessment have sufficient expertise. (b) Evaluate the hazards posed by the chemicals and the experimental conditions. The evaluation should cover toxic, physical, reactive, flammable, explosive, radiation, and biological hazards, as well as any other potential hazards posed by the chemicals. (c) For a variety of physical and chemical reasons, reaction scale-ups pose special risks, which merit additional prior review and precautions. (d) Select appropriate controls to minimize risk, including use of engineering controls, administrative controls, and personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect workers from hazards. The controls must ensure that OSHA's Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs) are not exceeded. Prepare for contingencies and be aware of the institutional procedures in the event of emergencies and accidents. - One sample approach to risk assessment is to answer these five questions: (a) What are the hazards? (b) What is the worst thing that could happen? (c) What can be done to prevent this from happening? (d) What can be done to protect from these hazards? (e) What should be

[3] Hazard and Risk - Risk Assessment

Page 1

Open source document

Source excerpt

CCOHS CCHST Canadian Centre for Occupational Health and Safety Centre canadien d'hygiène et de sécurité au travail Hazard and Risk # Hazard and Risk - Risk Assessment ## On this page What is a risk assessment? Why is risk assessment important? What is the goal of risk assessment? When should a risk assessment be done? How do you plan for a risk assessment? How is a risk assessment done? How are the hazards identified? How do you know if the hazard will cause harm (poses a risk)? How are risks ranked or prioritized? What risk assessment methods should be used? What are methods of hazard control? Why is it important to review and monitor the assessments? What documentation should be done for a risk assessment? ## What is a risk assessment? Risk assessment is a term used to describe the overall process or method where of identifying hazards, assessing the risk of hazards, and prioritizing hazards associated with a specific activity, task, or job. It considers the probability or likelihood of harm from exposure and the potential consequence or severity of harm from exposure to a hazard. A risk assessment is a thorough look at your workplace to identify those things, situations, processes, etc. that may cause harm, particularly to people. After the identification of a hazard, it should be reviewed to determine how likely and severe the potential harm is. When this determination is made, you can decide what measures should be in place to effectively eliminate or control the harm from happening (hazard control). Some important terms related to risk assessments include: Hazard - a potential source of injury, adverse health effect, or damage to people, structures, equipment, or the environment. A common way to classify hazards is to categorize them as biological, chemical, ergonomic, physical, psychosocial, and safety hazards. Hazard identification - the process of finding, listing, and characterizing hazards. Hazard and Risk - Risk Assessment CCOHS

[4] Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) Guide

Page 17

Open source document

Source excerpt

# Option 1 # Hazard Assessment For PPE Use with WAC [redacted identifier] Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) This tool can help you do a hazard assessment to see if your employees need to use personal protective equipment (PPE) by identifying activities that may create hazards for your employees. The activities are grouped according to what part of the body might need PPE. You can make copies, modify and customize it to fit the specific needs of your particular work place, or develop your own form that is appropriate to your work environment. This tool can also serve as written certification that you have done a hazard assessment as required by WAC 296-800-[redacted postal code] Document your hazard assessment for PPE. Make sure that the blank fields at the beginning of the checklist (indicated by *) are filled out (see below, Instructions #4). ## Instructions: 1. Do a walk through survey of each work area and job/task. Read through the list of work activities in the first column, putting a check next to the activities performed in that work area or job. 2. Read through the list of hazards in the second column, putting a check next to the hazards to which employees may be exposed while performing the work activities or while present in the work area. (for e.g., work activity: chopping wood; work-related exposure: flying particles). 3. Decide how you are going to control the hazards. Try considering engineering, work place, and/or administrative controls to eliminate or reduce the hazards before resorting to using PPE. If the hazard cannot be eliminated without using PPE, indicate which type(s) of PPE will be required to protect your employee from the hazard. 4. Make sure that you complete the following fields on the form (indicated by *) to certify that a hazard assessment was done: *Name of your work place *Address of the work place where you are doing the hazard assessment *Name of person certifying that a workplace hazard assessment was done *Da

[5] Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment

Page 6

Open source document

Source excerpt

# What types of PPE may be necessary? Your hazard assessment should determine if your employees need any of the following types of PPE: - Eye and face protection ◆ Fall protection - Foot protection • Hand/general skin protection - Head protection • Hearing protection • Leg protection ● Personal floatation device • Respiratory protection • Torso/general body protection ## How to do a PPE hazard assessment ## Do a baseline survey to identify workplace hazards A baseline survey is a thorough evaluation of your entire workplace - including work processes, tasks, and equipment - that identifies safety and health hazards. A complete survey will tell you what the hazards are, where they are, and how severe a potential injury could be. ## Suggestions: Use safety data sheets (SDS) to identify chemical hazards. A safety data sheet has detailed information about a hazardous chemical's health effects, its physical and chemical characteristics, and safe handling practices. Review equipment owner and operator manuals to determine the manufacturer's safety warnings and recommended PPE. Conduct a job-hazard analysis (JHA) - a method of identifying, assessing, and controlling hazards associated with specific jobs. A JHA breaks down a job into tasks. You evaluate each task to determine if there is a safer way to do it. A job-hazard analysis works well for jobs with difficult-to-control hazards and jobs with histories of accidents or near misses. JHAS for complex jobs can take a considerable amount of time and expertise to develop. You may want to have a safety professional help you. Have an experienced safety professional survey your workplace with you. 4

[6] Personal Protective Equipment Hazard Assessment

Page 8

Open source document

Source excerpt

# Evaluate your employees' exposures to each hazard identified in the baseline survey (cont.) ## Document your hazard assessment For each job assessed, documentation must include the following information: - A heading saying the document is a "certification" of the hazard assessment • The name of the workplace evaluated - The name of the person certifying the hazard assessment was completed PPE hazard assessment certification Workplace evaluated: Person certifying the evaluation: Hazard assessment date: • The date of each hazard assessment Use the PPE hazard assessment and certification form on our website to conduct your own hazard assessment. Construction industry and agricultural employers do not have to document their hazard assessments, but must tell each exposed employee about their PPE selection decisions and meet other rule requirements. ## Do regular workplace inspections Regular inspections tell you whether you have eliminated or controlled existing hazards, and help you identify new hazards. Quarterly inspections by employees trained in hazard recognition are a good way to get the job done. Look for new hazards whenever you change equipment, materials, or work processes. Determine what hazards could result from the changes and how to control them. If your business works at multiple sites, you may need to do a hazard assessment at each site. 6

Related Q&A

Keep exploring.

Human questionGeneral

Give me tool box meeting topic for cnrl pelican lake

For CNRL Pelican Lake operations, toolbox and tailgate meetings should be site-specific, task-based, and documented, with emphasis on field hazards typical of oilfield and construction-style work such as excavation, mobile equipment, hazardous energy, atmospheric hazards, and changing ground or weather conditions.

Read the thread
Human questionGeneral

Risk Assessment Reports

Workplace Safety Risk Assessment for General Occupational Activities ==================================================================== *Assessment Date:** \[DATE] *Assessor:** \[ASSESSOR NAME] *Department/Area:** \[DEPARTMENT/AREA] *Review Date:** \[REVIEW DATE] 1\. Assessment Scope This risk assessment covers

Read the thread
Human questionGeneral

Build a 1000 componet JHA

Job Hazard Analysis for 1000-Component Assembly Process ======================================================== *Assessment Date:** \[DATE] *Assessor:** \[ASSESSOR NAME] *Department/Area:** \[DEPARTMENT/AREA] *Review Date:** \[REVIEW DATE] 1\. Assessment Scope This Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) covers the assembly of a

Read the thread
Human questionGeneral

Write a risk assessment for Blending

Risk Assessment for Blending Operations ======================================= *Assessment Date:** \[DATE] *Assessor:** \[ASSESSOR NAME] *Department/Area:** \[DEPARTMENT/AREA] *Review Date:** \[REVIEW DATE] 1\. Assessment Scope This assessment covers routine blending operations in a production or processing area

Read the thread
Discussion thread

Add your experience.

Community answers can add practical context. They are moderated, but they are not SALUS-reviewed safety guidance.

New contributions are temporarily closed while the moderation queue is configured.

Community answers(0)

No community answers have been approved yet.

Comments on Rosie's answer(0)

No comments have been approved yet.

Ready to put operational safety to work?

Join 400K users across 150K sites already on SALUS.

No commitment · 30-minute personalized walkthrough