Skip to content
Inspections

Inspections that turn findings into fixes.

Walk the site, capture the finding, assign the owner, and verify the fix from the same workflow. Rosie, the AI Admin & Risk Assistant, connects every construction safety inspection to the worker, trade, location, photos, corrective actions, and dashboards that prove what changed.

  • Hours ยท Hazard closure in hours, not daysPaper corrective actions average 7 days to closure (Associated Builders and Contractors, Central Texas chapter, 2025). A connected inspection assigns the fix on the spot โ€” SALUS customers report closure in hours.
  • 1 flow ยท Find, assign, notify โ€” no separate moduleCorrective actions live inside the inspection itself. No re-entry, no follow-up calls, no module-hopping โ€” the walk is the work.

Conditional checklists, photos, annotations, and voice โ€” captured during the walk, not after it.

Four-step story: a supervisor spots a hazard on an upper floor with his phone, the foreman receives a corrective action notification, the framing trade installs yellow guardrails, and the foreman photographs the fix to close the loop
Talk findings into the form
Assign fixes by name
Track closure across sites
Loop closed on every dashboard
  1. Offline mobile inspections

  2. Rosie voice-to-form capture

  3. In-flow corrective actions

  4. Photo proof of closure

  5. Closure dashboards

01Act 1 ยท In the field

Walk the floor. Capture what matters.

Talk to Rosie

Speak the finding. Rosie files the inspection.

Photo, annotation, voice โ€” captured at the hazard, not rebuilt from memory at the trailer. The super photographs the condition, marks it up, and talks. Rosie turns the spoken finding into a completed inspection form and a drafted corrective action: issue category, severity, description, all filled for review before the walk moves on.

Inspection capture screen with a site photo of a concrete building interior, an annotation tool, a 12-second voice note waveform, and an observations fieldTwo phones: an AI Inputs screen capturing a photo and voice recording, and the resulting corrective action form auto-populated with issue category, AI-transcribed description, and severity
โ–ฃ

Snap & annotate

Photograph the condition and mark it up at the slab edge โ€” GPS attached.

โ‰‹

Speak

A voice note instead of 40 taps. Rosie transcribes and structures it.

โœ“

Filed

Form fields, category, severity, draft corrective action โ€” filled automatically.

Captured during the walk.

Mobile ยท offline-first

Inspect anything. Anywhere. With or without bars.

Parking levels, elevator cores, the 8th floor before the antennas go in. Inspections auto-save to local storage and sync the moment signal returns โ€” and two inspectors can work the same form at once without stepping on each other.

No bars, no problem โ€” the inspection doesn't notice.

Phone in offline mode with a red auto-saving banner, an equipment inspection form being edited by two workers at once, and conditional logic sections hidden
02Act 2 ยท The record

A finding should leave with an owner.

In-flow corrective actions

The corrective action starts before the report is written.

Identify the deficiency, pick the person who owns the fix โ€” a name, not a company โ€” set the due date, hit send. All inside the same inspection, with the site and project context attached.

New Corrective Action modal opened inside a daily safety report, with an Assign To dropdown listing individual workers and a Send Action button
Push notification card reading New Corrective Action 'Loose Wiring in Panel A' was assigned to you, showing high priority, a due date, the site, and who created it
โ—Ž

A name, not a company

The action belongs to the person who can actually fix it.

โ†ฏ

Notified โ€” instantly

Full context on their phone before you reach the stairs.

โ—‰

Viewed โ€” tracked

You know the moment it's seen. 'Never got it' stops being a defense.

โ†ฉ

Status โ€” in the open

Pending, in progress, completed โ€” visible until a human closes it.

Accountability has a first and last name.

Proof of closure

Closure means proof, not a checkbox.

When the fix goes in, the assignee closes the action with evidence: photos of the corrected condition, notes, timestamps, sign-offs where you require them. A 'paper fix' can't survive a photo requirement. The record keeps who closed it, when they closed it, and what it looked like after โ€” permanently.

The loop closes with a photo, not a promise.

Found. Fixed. Photographed. Closed.

Corrective action form with an 'Action marked as complete' banner and a confirmation card showing David Chen, Maintenance Lead, closing the loop with a green check
03Act 3 ยท In the office

Aging, repeat issues, closure velocity โ€” every open loop in view.

Closure dashboards

The field walks the floors. The office sees every loop.

Every unresolved finding sits on the dashboard โ€” by site, by sub, by days outstanding โ€” and closure velocity trends walk by walk. This quarter's view: 312 inspections across 9 projects, 42 corrective actions raised from those walks, 97% of them closed, each closure carrying its own evidence. Not a claim about the safety program โ€” a record of it.

An open loop ages in public.

Illustrative dashboard view โ€” the figures shown demonstrate the layout, not a specific customer outcome.

Inspection analytics tiles showing 312 total inspections, 9 active projects, 42 corrective actions raised from inspections, and 97% of corrective actions closed
Drill down to the evidence

Every number opens to the photo behind it.

Click the closure rate and it opens: the finding, the owner, the timestamps, the photo of the fix. And when the same finding keeps surfacing โ€” slab edge on one tower, housekeeping on another โ€” Rosie flags the repeat before it becomes the incident report. The full portfolio trend workflow lives in Risk Control.

Rosie chat flagging 142 outstanding actions on slab edge work, with bar charts breaking down outstanding actions by activity, by project, and by trade
โ†’

"How long has that finding been open?"

โ†’

"Who closed it โ€” and where's the photo?"

โ†’

"Which findings keep coming back?"

Done isn't a status. Done is a photograph.

Business impact

Safety inspections are how insurers, owners, and GCs measure you.

Most EHS incident management software measures success by reports stored. The real value sits upstream and downstream of the filing: whether crews report at all, whether evidence survives the first hour, whether fixes actually close, and whether the pattern surfaces before the next event.

Close hazards, not just forms

The connected flow compresses closure from days to hours โ€” the hazard stops existing sooner.

Defend the claim

Inspection, notification, and closure records connected to every question a carrier asks.

Personal accountability

Individual assignment beats sub-entity routing โ€” a name owns every open loop.

What is included

Construction safety inspection checklist, safety inspections, and closure tools.

01 ยท

Conditional inspections

Show the right checklist for the site, asset, and risk.

02 ยท

Rosie finding capture

Voice notes become structured inspection findings.

03 ยท

Photo and video evidence

Attach proof at the source.

04 ยท

In-flow corrective actions

Assign fixes during the inspection.

05 ยท

Offline inspection app

Keep the walk moving without signal.

06 ยท

Closure dashboards

Track aging, repeat findings, and proof.

Go deeper

Go deeper from finding to fix.

Inspections should create movement, not just documentation.

FAQ

Construction safety inspection software, safety audit, checklist, OSHA competent person, corrective action, and closure FAQ

What is construction safety inspection software?
Construction safety inspection software replaces paper checklists with mobile site walks, conditional inspection items, photos, annotations, voice notes, assigned corrective actions, closure proof, and dashboards for open findings.
What is the difference between a safety inspection and a safety audit?
A safety inspection checks field conditions, hazards, equipment, housekeeping, PPE, and work areas. A safety audit reviews whether the safety program, records, and follow-through are working. SALUS connects both by keeping the inspection, finding, owner, evidence, and closure record together.
What should a construction site safety inspection checklist include?
A construction inspection checklist should cover the conditions that apply to the work: access routes, fall protection, scaffolds, ladders, electrical, excavations, housekeeping, PPE, fire extinguishers, equipment, and trade-specific hazards. Conditional logic keeps irrelevant items hidden.
How often should construction sites be inspected?
OSHA's construction standard at 29 CFR 1926.20(b)(2) refers to frequent and regular inspections by competent persons, but does not set one universal interval. Many contractors run daily supervisor walks, weekly formal inspections, and additional checks for high-risk work or weather events.
What is a competent person in OSHA inspections?
OSHA defines a competent person at 29 CFR 1926.32(f) as someone capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards and authorized to take prompt corrective measures. SALUS helps document what was inspected, what was found, who owned the fix, and what evidence closed it.
Can SALUS handle fire extinguisher inspections and equipment inspections?
Yes. Teams can use QR codes to open the right checklist for fire extinguisher quick checks, ladder checks, harness checks, equipment pre-use checks, and asset inspections, with history and evidence attached.
Can inspectors complete inspections offline?
Yes. Inspectors can capture photos, notes, checklist responses, and findings offline. SALUS auto-saves locally and syncs when signal returns, including in parking levels, elevator cores, upper floors, and remote work areas.
Can two inspectors work on the same inspection?
Yes. SALUS supports collaboration on the same inspection form, so multiple contributors can capture findings without creating duplicate versions or losing work in a dead zone.
How does Rosie help with safety inspections?
Rosie, the AI Admin & Risk Assistant, can structure spoken inspection findings into a usable record, helping turn voice notes, photos, and field context into categories, descriptions, severity, and corrective action drafts for review.
Can inspection findings create corrective actions?
Yes. A deficiency can become an assigned corrective action inside the inspection flow, with a named owner, due date, notification, project context, and evidence requirement attached.
Can we require photo proof of closure?
Yes. Closure can require photos, notes, timestamps, and sign-offs, so the record shows who closed the finding, when they closed it, and what the corrected condition looked like.
What should we bring to an inspections demo?
Bring a current inspection checklist, site walk form, fire extinguisher check, equipment inspection, or open finding log. SALUS can show the closed-loop workflow from field capture to named owner, notification, photo evidence, and dashboard closure.
Verified compliance resource

Know what OSHA expects before an inspection.

Use the OSHA inspection guide to prepare the first 60 minutes, preserve records, and respond from verified evidence.

Open the OSHA inspection guide
Closed-loop demo

Bring your current inspection checklist.
We will show the closed-loop version.

Walk through capture, assignment, notification, proof, and dashboard closure from one inspection.

Bring the current workflow. We will map the live version from field action to proof.